Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked

Movie Info

Photos:

Reviews:
Roger Moore(Dallas Morning News):A Sarah Palin witticism? A Charlie Sheen wisecrack? Is this a Chipmunks movie or a Letterman monologue? Read more here: http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2011/12/15/2312646/scrap-wrecked-a-squeaky-but-tolerable.html#storylink=cpy
Nick Schager(Village Voice):Flails respecting in search of a creative mind to exist.
Jennie Punter(Globe and Mail):The evident nods to Castaway, Lost and other on a sudden culture references are barely worth a grin.
Lou Lumenick(New York Post):You usually accept to go to an Adam Sandler movie, or the Quad Cinema, to wait upon something as incompetently made as "Alvin and the Chipmunks.''
Sean O'Connell(Washington Post):"Chipwrecked" serves up again of the derivative chaos that floats this immunity's boat.
Peter Hartlaub(San Francisco Chronicle):It's one uninspired and instantly forgettable film. But it completely succeeds ~ means of its own standards: an 87-very small rainy-day distraction that will to all appearance make a zillion dollars.
Ignatiy Vishnevetsky(Movies conducive to the Masses):There's a origin of a light, goofy kids movie in some place in here, but it's buried below a pile of clich
Linda Cook(KWQC-TV (Iowa)):'Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked' is the third part in the series that both grownups and kids have the advantage. I like it, in part, according to what it doesn't do, that is sink to the lows of revolting body-function humor that replaces creative piece.
Ken Hanke(Mountain Xpress (Asheville, NC)):Within 5 minutes, I concluded that none one over the age of 4 could it may be withstand more than 3 minutes of those ghastly rodent voices without suffering permanent harm.
Grae Drake(Movies.com):Chipwrecked is a intellect-numbing piece of uninspired baloney, meant excepting that to pacify hyperactive children.
Jackie K. Cooper(Scotsman):Meant conducive to a kiddie audience. Adults will subsist brain dead by the time they be through all the squeaky songs
Susan Granger(SSG Syndicate):Shrill, weak and furry - these squeaky-voiced, computer-generated rodents are back because of their third formulaic frolic.
Philip French(Observer [UK]):Small kids resoluteness love it; I found it additional than endurable.
Andrew L. Urban(Urban Cinefile):Cheerful, not moreover scary, easily digestible (albeit some of the conference is indecipherable for us non-Chipmunks) and relentlessly forcible, Chip-Wrecked stays afloat delightfully
Kevin Carr(7M Pictures):It's in ~ degree big surprise that this franchise is sufferance from serious squeakquelitis.
Nell Minow(Movie Mom at Yahoo! Movies):The third in the series about the singing chipmunks and their exasperated end perpetually forgiving human father is a inconsiderable brighter and sweeter than its predecessors.
Jim Lane(Sacramento News & Review): ... attached some level, I really want to like these movies - only I can never remember them slow enough.
Liz Braun(Jam! Movies):The movie is a direction of motion to kill 90 minutes if you be under the necessity small children to amuse, but those 90 minutes could also be spent with them at the library, it may be, or at a swimming pool.
Thomas Leupp(Hollywood.com):Harmless -- and charmless.
Marjorie Baumgarten(Austin Chronicle):Ratatouille aloof, our children should not be playing with disease-carrying rodents.
Sandie Angulo Chen(Common Sense Media):Silly threequel is well stocked of pop-culture references and jokes.

Videos: